Financial Accounting can be defined as a branch of accounting which deals with the financial transactions of the company as well as records, summarizes and presents the financial statements. Flight centre travel group is the world's top-most and profitable travel retailer personally delivering amazing experiences to people, partners, and satisfying their customers to a great extent. This report deals with the financial policies that the company is adopting and various accounting standards.
- Offering the best assignment writing help
- Delivering the orders as fast as possible
- Providing maximum satisfaction at affordable rates
Accounting policies that relates to property, plant and equipment of FCT Group
As per the Annual report of FCT Group, company is following the guidelines provided by the Australian Accounting Standard Board. Financial statements are prepared as per the Australian Accounting standards which show true and fair view. These accounting standards needs to be followed by the company in order to set the disclosure of financial transactions. Flight centre travel group is charging depreciation on assets as per the policies given by the Accounting standards of Australia (Acharya, V.V.,and et.al., 2013)Company is charging depreciation by following Straight line method so as to reduce the carrying amount of an asset over its useful life. Property, plants and equipment are disclosed at historical cost less depreciation. The useful life of property, plants and equipment are analyzed and checked at the end of each financial year (Al-Najjar, B. and Hussainey, K., 2011)
According to the financial statement of FLT, it can be seen that book amount of building at the end of financial year 2016 is declined in comparison to 2015. This is due to the gain realized in the year 2016 on sale of New Zealand head office building. There was no disposal of property in 2015 which results in higher book value. But if analyzing the accounting policies followed by FLT group, there is an increase in net book amount of plant and equipment in 2016 as compared to 2015 by $31111 which is due to the impairment of the plant and equipment in USA segment. Impairment loss is identified and assessed by the firm when the asset's carrying cost exceeds its recoverable amount. FLT recognizes its impairment loss in profit and loss statement.
Disclosure Requirements of AASB116 and AASB 136
FLT group has prepared its financial report as per the Australian Accounting Standards which helps the company to present true and fair view to their customers, competitors etc. In the context of property, plant and equipment company has referred AASB116 which deals with the accounting treatment of the assets so as to help the customers to infer information regarding the depreciation charged on asset, recognition on sale of any asset, impairment losses etc (Cassell, C.A., and et.al., 2012.)
AASB 136 deals specifically with the impairment of assets and this accounting standard helps to ensure that no asset should be carried more than its recoverable amount but is its more than recoverable amount then impairment loss must be recognized and the related disclosures.
FLT has followed all the accounting standards prescribed by AASB that is they have stated their assets at historical cost less depreciation. Impairment loss has also been recognized by the company which shows that their financial statements show true facts and figures regarding property, plant and equipment.
An intangible asset can be defined as a non-physical asset and which are also considered as non-monetary asset having a life greater than one year. FLT considers many intangible assets and they are not subject to amortisation but they can be impaired therefore, impairment losses must be recognized in the financial statements regarding goodwill and other intangible assets.
Categories of intangible assets of FLT group
Other than goodwill, FLT has also considered brand names and customer relationships and other intangible assets which are related to software and these intangible assets are amortised over their expected useful life. As the brand names have indefinite life , therefore company owns these brands and use them on a continuous basis.
Net book amount of goodwill increases at the end of 2016 as no impairment loss is considered in goodwill therefore, its value increases because of the acquistions inspite of some portion is transferred to reserves. But in the case of brand names and other intangible assets, impairment loss is recognized. In the financial year 2016, various brand names as well as other intangible assets have been acquired by the company which results in increment in the net book value of assets. FLT had not charged any impairment losses in the prior years. Impairment charges of indefinite life intangibles are recognised in profit and loss statements other than goodwill.
Their useful lives are estimated according to the class or group of intangible assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets have an indefinite useful life but customer relationships are amortized over their expected useful life but their expected useful life must not exceed seven years. And the useful life of other intangible assets should not exceed 2.5-5 years.
Company is also considering impairment charges of intangible assets. An impairment loss is recognised when an asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable value. This loss is recognized in profit and loss statement. Other than goodwill, impairment loss must be reviwed for reversal at the end of each financial period.
FLT group has amortised various intangible assets like goodwill, brand names and customer relationships etc. They have followed different policies regarding impairment of intangible assets.
As per Accounting standards, provision can be defined as an amount set aside from the company's profits for an expected liability to be arised in future. Company specifies in its report an accounting treatment of provisions in the financial statements.
Accounting treatment of provisions and policies in respect to long service leaves
Provision is an amount set aside from the profits of the company therefore, it becomes the liability of the company. Provisions appear in the liabilities side of the balance sheet under the head current liabilities.
As per accounting standards, company has followed accounting policies in respect of long service leaves(LSL). Long service leaves can be defined as the leaves which are given to an employee after working for a long period of time. As per the annual report of FLT Group, employees who have completed the required service period are entitled for long service leaves with an entitlement of pro-rata payments within next 12 months after the end of financial year. LSL obligations which are expected to be settled within next 12 months is increased in 2016 which means that amounts are not settled within the given period of time. It is stated in an annual report of FLT group in notes to financial statements F7 (Covas, F. and Den Haan, W.J., 2012.)Value of long service leave obligation which appears in the balance sheet in the year 2015 was $21475 and in the year 2016 is $25634.
Accounting treatment of unrecognised dividend
Unrecognized dividends are considered as dividends which have been declared by the company after the balance sheet date but they are not recognized. This unrecognized dividend will come under the head of provisions as it will be considered as an obligation of the company to pay in future to the shareholders. According to the IAS 10 “Events occuring after the balance sheet date”, it will be considered as a liability for the FLT group (Taani, K. and Banykhaled, M.H.H., 2011.)
As per the above assessment of Long service leaves and unrecognized dividends, company has followed proper accounting policies and procedures to expand their productivity and gives customers an accurate feedback about the company.
This section deals with contingent liabilities of the company and about the disclosure requirements needs to be presented by the company in their financial statements. It also presents about the contingent assets and their disclosure requirements.
Contingent assets and liabilities and their disclosure in financial statements
IAS 37 deals with the provisions, contingents assets and contingent liabilities. As per IAS 37, contingent liabilities can be defined as a present obligation for the company which depends on some uncertain future events. It is required by the companies to disclose contingent liabilities in financial statements even if they are not recognized by the company. They are to be disclosed in financial statements as a footnote and not really shown in balance sheet as they are not estimated by the company (Ahmed Sheikh, N. and Wang, Z., 2011)
Company is having its contingent liabilities regarding the rental expenses as it becomes the present obligation for FLT group. FLT has also having contingent consideration regarding a law test case against ACCC who further appealed to the high court for which the judgement was anticipated at the end of the year 2016. therefore, this liability is regarded as contingent liability. Contingent liabilities are disclosed as a footnote below the balance sheet and not shown in the financial statements (Marks and Spencer’s Balance sheet. 2016. [Online].
Contingent assets are defined by the IAS 37 as whose existence will be confirmed only on the occurrence or non occurrence of any future event. Contingent assets are also disclosed in notes to financial statements like contingent liabilities and they are also not shown in balance sheet as an asset.
Ratios are considered as a very famous tool for analysing financial statement of a company. Shareholders can view true and fair position of financial statements of the company that whether company is able to repay its debts or not, assessing the liquidity position of the company etc.
Calculation of financial ratios of company
|Ratios||Formula||Calculation for year 2016||Calculation for year 2015||Results(2016)||Results(2015)|
|Current ratio||current assets/current liabilities||2263233/1566724||215270/1452500||1.44||0.15|
|Rate of return on total assets||EBIT/total assets||345043/3001316*100||366297/2787966*100||11.50||13.14|
|Times interest earned||EBIT/interest earned||345043/27004||366297/29449||12.78||12.44|
|Price earning ratio||market price/earning per share||31.58/242.4||531924/1270121*100||0.13||0.12|
Analysis of the financial ratios
Current ratio includes current assets and current liabilities. It measures the liquidity of the company. In 2016, current ratio is increased as compared to 2015, that is company's current assets are 1.44 times more than current liabilities which shows the company's better financial position (Industrial benchmark ratios for UK Retail Industry. 2016.)
Rate of return on total assets indicated that how effectively a company is using its assets. Company's capacity of using its total assets in 2016 in comparison to 2015 is decreased by approximately 2%.
Interest is earned on operating profit is higher in both the periods which shows the better financial position of the organization.
Debt-equity ratio is used by the company to see that how much debt a company is using to finance its assets. High debt equity ratio indicated that company is undertaking high debt and thus has high risk. Here, FLT is not undertaking high risk as they have lower debt-equity ratio.
Price earning ratio indicates that how much an investor can expect to invest in a company in order to receive company's earnings. Companies with higher P/E ratio are expect to grow in future as compared to the lower P/E ratio.
If your dream is to get top grades, get a rewarding assignment service from us.Brilliant Assignment Services
Toll Free: +61 email@example.com
As per the annual reports of the company, company's financial position is sound and it is able to repay its debts. Ratios indicates the performance of the company and its growth which helps the investors to decide whether to invest or not.
You may also like to read:
- Acharya, V.V.,and et.al., 2013. Corporate governance and value creation: Evidence from private equity. Review of Financial Studies, 26(2), pp.368-402.
- Ahmed Sheikh, N. and Wang, Z., 2011. Determinants of capital structure: An empirical study of firms in manufacturing industry of Pakistan. Managerial Finance. 37(2). pp.117-133.
- Al-Najjar, B. and Hussainey, K., 2011. Revisiting the capital-structure puzzle: UK evidence. The Journal of Risk Finance. 12(4). pp.329-338.
- Cassell, C.A., and et.al., 2012. Seeking safety: The relation between CEO inside debt holdings and the riskiness of firm investment and financial policies. Journal of Financial Economics. 103(3). pp.588-610.
- Covas, F. and Den Haan, W.J., 2012. The role of debt and equity finance over the business cycle. The Economic Journal. 122(565). pp.1262-1286.
- Taani, K. and Banykhaled, M.H.H., 2011. The effect of financial ratios, firm size and cash flows from operating activities on earnings per share:(an applied study: on Jordanian industrial sector).International journal of social sciences and humanity studies. 3(1). pp.1309-8063.
- Wei, C. and Yermack, D., 2011. Investor reactions to CEOs' inside debt incentives. Review of Financial Studies. 24(11). pp.3813-3840.